With terrorism set to explode, people need to be clear on what ‘hate’, ‘racism’ and ‘terrorism’ are, and whether the emotions fuelling ‘racism’ and ‘hate’ are actually borne out of the actions of ‘terrorism’ allegedly committed by Muslims to be factually correct in order to justify, or not, the reprehensible actions committed against them. For instance, calling Muslims ‘terrorists’ is not only defamation of character but a corruption of truth, because, as most dictionaries attest, and according to the OED, ‘terrorism’ is “the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims”, remaining factually misrepresentative of the actions of Muslims, whose character and actions do NOT fit the woeful, stereotypical, social perspective in any way or form.
The accuracy of such, points out the Muslims, who are in fact, the “civilians” AGAINST WHOM terrorism is BEING committed and use of “unlawfull violance and intimidation…in the pursuit of political aims”. Whether, in their home-land or on foreign soil – An example, would insult the reader’s intelligence!
And it’s even harder to disagree when the reality is stark and in full view standing is, the very thing exerting ‘intimidation and violence’ against Muslims; that, which is at the same time, actually inciting, locally and globally, the “hatred” and envigorating “racism” against them.
Is it Right then that, Muslims should bear the erroneous label of ‘terrorists’ while, the real perpetrators escape its ‘fire and fury’, aimed away from them and towards the wrongful, victimisation of Muslims instead of pinned upon the REAL ‘terrorists’ and aggressors, who so righfully merit it and by which should be identified and ultimately punished?